Skip to main content

Jordan Davis or Jalen Carter: The Eagles Can't Pay Both — And That Changes Everything

Jalen Carter is projected for a four-year deal worth $120-140 million. Jordan Davis is looking at $55 million over three years. The Eagles' defensive line dominance hinges on a decision Howie Roseman can't afford to get wrong.

T

The JAKIB Staff

contributor

4 min read

Jalen Carter enters Year 4 and is now extension-eligible. The projected price tag? A four-year deal worth between $120 and $140 million, averaging more than $30 million per year. Jordan Davis, meanwhile, is looking at a three-year, $55 million deal. Add Jaelan Phillips' expected contract into the mix, and you're staring at over $75 million annually committed to defensive linemen — not one of whom is an elite pass rusher.

That math doesn't work. Not if you want to win a Super Bowl.

The Carter Case

Carter is one of the most disruptive interior defenders in the NFL. He turns 25 in April. He's got the ceiling of a generational player. But here's the catch — when he didn't have quality help beside him early last season, the double teams ate him alive. His production cratered. His effort waned. He might have even gotten hurt from the sheer volume of reps he was absorbing.

When Phillips arrived and gave the defense a legitimate edge presence, Carter transformed. The whole defense got better. That's not a coincidence — it's a blueprint. Before you hand Carter $35 million a year, you better make damn sure you've got someone quality lined up next to him. Pay the man that money and then stick a stiff beside him, and he's back to taking a thousand reps and fighting double teams. How does that make sense?

The Davis Dilemma

Jordan Davis has been a polarizing figure since draft day. The defensive tackle market has exploded — Chris Jones leads at $31.75 million, Milton Williams signed for $26 million, Zach Allen in Denver at $25.5 million. Davis' camp is going to push for top-of-market money.

The question is whether Davis is worth it. He's a space-eater who frees up Carter. He's not a sack artist. He's not a game-wrecker on his own. But his presence makes everyone around him better. That's valuable — the question is how valuable compared to what the Eagles need to spend elsewhere.

The Bradley Chubb Alternative

Here's a smarter play: sign Bradley Chubb to a two-year, $12 million deal. That's $10 million less than what Phillips would cost. Chubb had 8.5 sacks last year. He's played for Vic Fangio in two different places — Denver and Miami — so the defensive coordinator already knows exactly what he's getting. Put Chubb next to Carter, and Carter becomes a better player immediately.

Then take the savings and re-sign Nakobe Dean. Keep the linebacker corps intact. Dean is looking at maybe $12-15 million on the open market — that's the cost of doing business if you want to compete. You want to be in the game or on the sideline?

The Milton Williams Story

There's a fun parallel in Eagles history here. Remember the 2021 draft? Tom Donahue wanted Aleem McNeill. Howie Roseman wanted Milton Williams. Both went in the third round. Both turned out to be excellent players. But Roseman was arguably more right — he got comparable production without paying first-round money. That's Howie ball at its best.

Williams has become a flat-out awesome player — unassuming out of Louisiana Tech with marginal college stats, now earning $26 million a year. The Eagles need that same value-finding instinct right now. Because paying top dollar for Davis, Carter, and an edge rusher simultaneously isn't roster management — it's salary cap suicide.

Carter is the priority. Lock him up. But do it with a plan — get Chubb or a quality edge rusher beside him first, so you're not paying $35 million for a guy who's absorbing double teams because he has no help. That's how championship rosters are built. Not by paying everyone, but by paying the right ones and finding value everywhere else.

Support independent Eagles coverage

Explore JAKIB membership and find the option that works for you.

Explore membership
T

The JAKIB Staff

AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.

Share this article

Related Articles

Analysis

Jalen Hurts’ Development Tests the Eagles’ Offensive Structure

Jalen Hurts' development tests the Eagles' offensive structure because quarterback improvement depends on more than the player's individual work. Philadelphia also has to provide clear rules, connected concepts and a coaching operation that turns corrections into usable answers.

Analysis

The Eagles’ Fangio Question Is About Adjustments, Not Just Talent

Vic Fangio’s defensive challenge connects coverage spacing, pressure timing and run fits. The Bears discussion shows why changing one part of the plan can expose another.

Analysis

The Eagles’ $60 Million Interior Must Carry More of the Defense

The show’s $60 million shorthand for Jalen Carter and Jordan Davis raises a performance question, not a verified combined-payroll statistic. Philadelphia needs its interior to keep linebackers clean and compress passing lanes after Case Keenum exploited the middle of the defense.

Analysis

How Chicago’s Quarterback Question Changes the Eagles’ Defensive Plan

Caleb Williams is out, but Chicago had not named Tyson Bagent or Case Keenum as its starter at publication. Vic Fangio’s plan therefore has to control the Bears’ run game first and adjust to the quarterback who actually takes the field.

Opinion

Why the Eagles Should Keep the Ball in Jalen Hurts’ Hands

The Eagles should keep the ball in Jalen Hurts' hands even after a couple of passing mistakes. Retreating into a risk-avoidance offense would sacrifice the rhythm Philadelphia is trying to build and put even more strain on a ground game that has not provided a dependable early-down answer. Trust.

Analysis

Jalen Hurts’ Next Contract Is About More Than Two Games

Jalen Hurts’ next contract cannot be judged from only two games in the Eagles’ new offense Eight quarters may reveal how Sean Mannion’s system is functioning, but they are too small a sample to settle the value of a quarterback with a longer record of winning.