Skip to main content

Jordan Davis vs. Jalen Carter: The $100 Million Question the Eagles Can't Avoid

The Eagles can't pay both defensive tackles top-dollar. Davis' breakout year just made this the most consequential decision of the offseason.

T

The JAKIB Staff

contributor

3 min read

The Eagles have a $100 million question sitting in the middle of their defensive line, and it's not about whether Jalen Carter is talented. It's about whether they can afford to pay both him and Jordan Davis — and which one actually earned it.

Jordan Davis' Breakout Year

Jordan Davis showed up in 2025. Finally. After three years of questions about his conditioning, his snap count, and whether the 13th overall pick was living up to his draft pedigree, Davis put together the kind of season that changes contract negotiations.

The numbers: 50 solo tackles (second among all defensive interior players per PFF), 5 sacks, 20 assists. For a nose tackle who was supposedly just a run-stuffer, those are elite numbers. Osa Odighizuwa in Dallas is making $20 million a year with fewer tackles and fewer sacks. The market is the market.

The problem? Davis is on his fifth-year option. After this season, he hits unrestricted free agency. The Eagles can't kick this can much further down the road.

The Jalen Carter Question

Carter's projected contract is staggering: four years, $120-140 million, averaging north of $30 million annually. He earned second-team All-Pro honors, which triggers a higher fifth-year option number — likely around $27 million for 2027.

But here's the uncomfortable truth: Carter's talent is undeniable, but his consistency isn't. He disappeared for stretches in 2025 before Jaelan Phillips arrived and took pressure off him. When Carter was the only threat on that interior, opposing offenses schemed around him with double teams and the production cratered.

Compare the market. Chris Jones leads all DTs at $31.75 million per year. Milton Williams just signed for $26 million. The Eagles would be paying Carter top-of-market money for a player who hasn't proven he can carry a defensive line alone.

The Math That Doesn't Work

Pay both? That's roughly $55-60 million per year committed to two defensive tackles. Name another team in the NFL doing that. You can't, because it doesn't exist.

If Davis commands $17-20 million annually — and comparable contracts for Travis Jones (3 years, $40 million) and Vita Vea (4 years, $71 million) suggest he will — and Carter wants $35 million, the Eagles are looking at defensive tackle money that could fund an entire secondary.

The Smart Play

Lock up Davis now. Three years, $55 million feels right — roughly $18 million per year with significant guarantees. Davis proved in 2025 that he's not just a two-down player. His conditioning transformation under DL coach Clint Hurtt was the most underrated storyline of the season.

As for Carter, pick up the fifth-year option and let 2026 determine his long-term value. If he dominates without needing someone else to draw attention, pay him. If he disappears again when he's the focal point, you have your answer.

The irony is rich: the guy drafted 13th overall who everyone questioned is now the safer investment, while the guy everyone called a generational talent is the riskier bet. That's the NFL. Talent without consistency is just potential, and potential doesn't win in January.

Support independent Eagles coverage

Explore JAKIB membership and find the option that works for you.

Explore membership
T

The JAKIB Staff

AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.

Share this article

Related Articles

Analysis

Eagles–Rams Puts Defensive-Front Versatility Back in Focus

The Eagles’ defensive front needs more than recognizable names against the Rams. It needs enough versatility to keep pressure, run fits and linebacker protection working together when Los Angeles changes the picture.

Analysis

Jalen Hurts Can Raise the Eagles’ Level, but He Cannot Replace an Entire Roster

Jalen Hurts can give the Eagles a chance against the Rams without being able to replace every missing player. Philadelphia’s injury report turns that distinction into a practical football problem, not an excuse to lower the quarterback’s standard.

Analysis

Jalen Hurts’ Development Tests the Eagles’ Offensive Structure

Jalen Hurts' development tests the Eagles' offensive structure because quarterback improvement depends on more than the player's individual work. Philadelphia also has to provide clear rules, connected concepts and a coaching operation that turns corrections into usable answers.

Analysis

The Eagles’ Fangio Question Is About Adjustments, Not Just Talent

Vic Fangio’s defensive challenge connects coverage spacing, pressure timing and run fits. The Bears discussion shows why changing one part of the plan can expose another.

Analysis

The Eagles’ $60 Million Interior Must Carry More of the Defense

The show’s $60 million shorthand for Jalen Carter and Jordan Davis raises a performance question, not a verified combined-payroll statistic. Philadelphia needs its interior to keep linebackers clean and compress passing lanes after Case Keenum exploited the middle of the defense.

Analysis

How Chicago’s Quarterback Question Changes the Eagles’ Defensive Plan

Caleb Williams is out, but Chicago had not named Tyson Bagent or Case Keenum as its starter at publication. Vic Fangio’s plan therefore has to control the Bears’ run game first and adjust to the quarterback who actually takes the field.