Jordan Davis vs. Jalen Carter: The $100 Million Question the Eagles Can't Avoid
The Eagles can't pay both defensive tackles top-dollar. Davis' breakout year just made this the most consequential decision of the offseason.
The JAKIB Staff
contributor
The Eagles have a $100 million question sitting in the middle of their defensive line, and it's not about whether Jalen Carter is talented. It's about whether they can afford to pay both him and Jordan Davis — and which one actually earned it.
Jordan Davis' Breakout Year
Jordan Davis showed up in 2025. Finally. After three years of questions about his conditioning, his snap count, and whether the 13th overall pick was living up to his draft pedigree, Davis put together the kind of season that changes contract negotiations.
The numbers: 50 solo tackles (second among all defensive interior players per PFF), 5 sacks, 20 assists. For a nose tackle who was supposedly just a run-stuffer, those are elite numbers. Osa Odighizuwa in Dallas is making $20 million a year with fewer tackles and fewer sacks. The market is the market.
The problem? Davis is on his fifth-year option. After this season, he hits unrestricted free agency. The Eagles can't kick this can much further down the road.
The Jalen Carter Question
Carter's projected contract is staggering: four years, $120-140 million, averaging north of $30 million annually. He earned second-team All-Pro honors, which triggers a higher fifth-year option number — likely around $27 million for 2027.
But here's the uncomfortable truth: Carter's talent is undeniable, but his consistency isn't. He disappeared for stretches in 2025 before Jaelan Phillips arrived and took pressure off him. When Carter was the only threat on that interior, opposing offenses schemed around him with double teams and the production cratered.
Compare the market. Chris Jones leads all DTs at $31.75 million per year. Milton Williams just signed for $26 million. The Eagles would be paying Carter top-of-market money for a player who hasn't proven he can carry a defensive line alone.
The Math That Doesn't Work
Pay both? That's roughly $55-60 million per year committed to two defensive tackles. Name another team in the NFL doing that. You can't, because it doesn't exist.
If Davis commands $17-20 million annually — and comparable contracts for Travis Jones (3 years, $40 million) and Vita Vea (4 years, $71 million) suggest he will — and Carter wants $35 million, the Eagles are looking at defensive tackle money that could fund an entire secondary.
The Smart Play
Lock up Davis now. Three years, $55 million feels right — roughly $18 million per year with significant guarantees. Davis proved in 2025 that he's not just a two-down player. His conditioning transformation under DL coach Clint Hurtt was the most underrated storyline of the season.
As for Carter, pick up the fifth-year option and let 2026 determine his long-term value. If he dominates without needing someone else to draw attention, pay him. If he disappears again when he's the focal point, you have your answer.
The irony is rich: the guy drafted 13th overall who everyone questioned is now the safer investment, while the guy everyone called a generational talent is the riskier bet. That's the NFL. Talent without consistency is just potential, and potential doesn't win in January.
Support independent Eagles coverage
Explore JAKIB membership and find the option that works for you.
The JAKIB Staff
AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.
Related Articles
The Eagles’ Defensive Depth Bill Is Coming Due
Philadelphia’s defensive investments still require reliable players around them. The current injury report puts the value of specific replacement roles back in focus.
The Eagles’ Message to Jalen Hurts Reaches the Entire Locker Room
The Eagles and Nicole Lynn have issued a health update on Jalen Hurts. A direct ownership commitment could add a message about support that reaches his teammates, without claiming to resolve private or medical questions.
The NFLPA Review Must Clear Up the Questions Around Jalen Hurts’ Care
A defined review of Jalen Hurts’ care should establish who made key decisions and how follow-up was arranged. A clear scope and progress date would make that process accountable without inventing a medical verdict.
The NFL and NFLPA Are Asking Different Jalen Hurts Questions
The NFL has defended the handling of Jalen Hurts’ medical care while the NFLPA seeks a full investigation. A defined review process could address follow-up questions while respecting his privacy.
A One-Year Bridge Could Separate the Eagles’ Jalen Hurts Decisions
A proposed one-year bridge would let the Eagles separate immediate continuity from a long commitment to Jalen Hurts. Its value would depend on the football evidence and the agreement both sides could reach.
Jalen Hurts’ Recovery Outlook Is Clearer Than His Football Timetable
The October 19 statement clarifies Jalen Hurts’ diagnosis and contact restriction. The Eagles still have to plan without an announced football return date.