Hot Take: Bill Belichick's Hall of Fame Snub Is an Embarrassment to the Sport
Zander Krause and John McMullen torch the Hall of Fame voters who kept Bill Belichick out on the first ballot. Eight Super Bowls aren't enough?
Hot Take: Bill Belichick's Hall of Fame Snub Is an Embarrassment to the Sport
If Bill Belichick — the coach with eight Super Bowl appearances and six championships as a head coach — isn't a first-ballot Hall of Famer, then what exactly are we doing here? That was the unanimous sentiment on Thursday's Birds 365, where both Zander Krause and John McMullen tore into the Hall of Fame voting process.
The Textbook Definition of First Ballot
Krause didn't mince words, arguing that anyone who didn't vote for Belichick should lose their voting privileges entirely. His reasoning was straightforward: if personal biases prevent a voter from recognizing what should be the most obvious first-ballot selection in modern history, that voter is unfit to serve as a steward of the game's history.
"If you honestly believe that he is not the textbook definition of a first-ballot Hall of Famer, then you shouldn't be a voter," Krause said. "You're voting to justify your own thought processes more importantly than telling the honest Hall of Fame record of the NFL."
Krause also cited Dan Sileo's argument that if Belichick isn't a first-ballot inductee, it delegitimizes what every other coach has accomplished — including Nick Sirianni's impressive early-career record.
The Spygate Context Nobody Talks About
McMullen provided historical context that cuts against the Spygate narrative that has likely influenced some voters. He referenced Seth Wickersham's investigative book, which included a conversation between NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell and legendary coach Mike Shanahan during the original Spygate investigation.
When Goodell asked Shanahan about the situation, Shanahan's response was revealing: he said he wished he had thought to videotape signals and was disappointed in himself for not doing it. Shanahan told Goodell that people are always trying to steal signs, that it's been going on forever, and that Belichick was simply better at it than most.
McMullen also pointed to more recent examples, noting that sign-stealing remains a core part of NFL gamesmanship. He cited Grant Udinski's reputation for being excellent at stealing signs and Robert Saleh's sideline confrontation with Liam Coen in Jacksonville over the same issue.
A Broken System
McMullen pointed to systemic problems with the Hall of Fame voting process itself. He noted that while the voting body includes former players, coaches, and executives, it's dominated by media members — some of whom may have held grudges against Belichick for his famously terse press conferences.
He singled out Bill Polian's claim of 'I don't remember' regarding his vote as particularly disingenuous, suggesting Polian's stance was rooted in jealousy rather than genuine uncertainty. McMullen also referenced Mike Sando's explanation on X about the 'goofy limitations' voters operate under, suggesting the process is more convoluted than it should be.
The silver lining, according to McMullen, is that the Belichick snub may finally force the Hall of Fame to reform its voting procedures. But for now, it remains a stain on the institution — one that says more about the voters than it does about the greatest coach in NFL history.
Watch the full episode of Birds 365 on YouTube at youtube.com/@jakibsports. Listen on Apple Podcasts (search 'Birds 365 Philadelphia Eagles') or Spotify (search 'JAKIB Sports').
Enjoying this article?
JAKIB members get premium articles, ad-free shows, exclusive content, and community access. Starting at $4.99/mo.
JAKIB AI
AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.