Minnesota's Analytics Mistake: Vikings GM Admits Moving On From Sam Darnold Was Wrong

While the Sean Mannion hire dominated Friday's National Football Show, Dan Sileo and guest Mike North both zeroed in on a story that crystallizes one of football's biggest ongoing debates: the Minnesota Vikings' general manager publicly admitted that moving on from Sam Darnold was a mistake.

And now Darnold is heading to the Super Bowl with Seattle.

"The general manager finally admitted that it was a mistake to get rid of Sam Darnold. Analytics people made them move on from Sam Darnold." — Dan Sileo

The Analytics Problem

Sileo painted a vivid picture of how the decision went down: analytics staffers presented data suggesting that Darnold's 14-win 2024 season was unsustainable, that regression was inevitable, and that the Vikings should commit to their rookie quarterback instead.

"Can you imagine that? A guy with a protractor walked down to a personnel department and to a general manager and said, 'We're telling you that the odds of Sam Darnold being a better player next year for you here in Minnesota is highly unlikely.' So they went with some sort of thesis instead of actually a football gut." — Dan Sileo

The result? Minnesota moved on. Darnold landed in Seattle, won games, and is now preparing for a Super Bowl. The Vikings fired their analytics-driven GM.

Mike North's Takeaway

Chicago radio legend Mike North, joining the show in his regular Friday segment, connected the Darnold situation to his broader critique of analytics overreach in football.

"Maybe, just maybe, it would make him sick to watch the Super Bowl and see a guy that won 14 games. Sam Darnold. And then he goes to another team and does the same thing. The only man in history to do it with two different teams. And you're the GM of the team. This guy's launched, okay, because no matter how you try to paint it, the NFL likes the coaching things. That was a mistake." — Mike North

North praised Darnold's redemption arc as a triumph of football instinct over spreadsheet analysis, calling it proof that the human element of roster building can't be reduced to algorithms.

Lessons for the Eagles

Sileo connected the Minnesota story back to Philadelphia, where the Eagles have described themselves as a "risk-averse" organization that leans heavily on data-driven decision making. The irony of hiring a 24-month coach as your OC while claiming to be risk-averse was not lost on Sileo.

"For a team that doesn't like to gamble and is risk averse, how is this risk averse? They believe in risk-averse offense, right? So you hire a guy that's been a coach for 24 months. It doesn't make sense." — Dan Sileo

The Minnesota cautionary tale adds another layer: analytics told the Vikings to move on from a quarterback who's now playing for a championship. Could a similar data-driven blind spot be affecting how the Eagles evaluate coaching candidates?

Darnold's Redemption

Both Sileo and North acknowledged Darnold's remarkable journey. The former number-three overall pick was written off after struggles with the Jets and Panthers, reinvented himself with a 14-win season in Minnesota, was cast aside again by analytics, and emerged as a Super Bowl starting quarterback in Seattle.

Sileo reviewed Darnold's pre-draft scouting report in detail during the show, noting that many of the strengths identified coming out of USC — reading defenses, scanning the full field, toughness in the pocket — have finally materialized with the right coaching and supporting cast.

"Everybody in their life, the successes — this guy seems like, 'Hey, I got my life in order. I worked for a couple bad companies that didn't know how to develop me, and now I got my opportunity.' I couldn't be happier for him." — Mike North

The Vikings' admission is a stark reminder: in a league increasingly driven by data, the best decisions are still sometimes made by people who trust their eyes and their gut. Minnesota's GM trusted the numbers. The numbers were wrong. And Sam Darnold is the one playing in February.