Skip to main content

The Jalen Hurts Running Debate: Use It or Lose Him

Jalen Hurts' rushing attempts dropped off a cliff last season. If the Eagles don't get their franchise QB running again, they need to start planning for the future.

T

The JAKIB Staff

contributor

3 min read

A Drastic Drop-Off

The numbers don't lie. Jalen Hurts' rushing attempts per game fell off a cliff last season compared to every other year of his career. The gap between what we saw in 2024 and prior seasons wasn't just noticeable — it was jarring.

This isn't about being reckless. Nobody wants Hurts running 15 times a game and taking unnecessary hits. But the near-total disappearance of his running game removed one of the most dangerous weapons in the Eagles' offensive arsenal.

Maximize the Shelf Life

Here's the uncomfortable truth that nobody in Eagles Nation wants to hear: Jalen Hurts is a unique player, and unique players need to use what makes them unique.

The running game — the designed runs, the RPO pulls, the scramble conversions — that's what separates Hurts from being just another quarterback. Take that away, and you're asking him to be something he's never been: a pure pocket passer who reads progressions, climbs the pocket, and delivers the ball on time to the second and third read.

That's not who Jalen Hurts is. And at 27 years old, it's unrealistic to expect him to completely reinvent his game because the organization wants to protect his body.

The better approach? Maximize the shelf life of what makes him special. Use the running game strategically — maybe not at the 2022-23 rate, but far more than what we saw last season. Get the most out of this player's prime years rather than trying to turn him into a completely different quarterback.

The Organization's Role

This isn't all on Hurts. The Eagles have a responsibility to design an offense that maximizes their franchise quarterback's strengths. If they're asking him to morph into a traditional drop-back passer AND hiring coaches without proven track records of developing quarterbacks in that style, that's an organizational failure.

The shift toward a more Shanahan-inspired offense could work — but only if it incorporates what Hurts does best. Under-center play-action with Hurts as a legitimate running threat is terrifying for defenses. Under-center play-action where everyone knows Hurts isn't going to keep it? That's just a gimmick.

The Tough Conversation

If Hurts himself has decided he doesn't want to run anymore, then the Eagles need to have a very different conversation. Because a non-running Jalen Hurts, one who won't climb the pocket or run progressions consistently, is not the franchise quarterback this team needs long-term.

That's not a popular take. But it's a realistic one. The best thing for both parties is to find the middle ground: run enough to keep defenses honest, protect Hurts on the designed runs, and build an offense that accentuates his dual-threat ability rather than trying to eliminate it.

Support independent Eagles coverage

Explore JAKIB membership and find the option that works for you.

Explore membership
T

The JAKIB Staff

AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.

Share this article

More on this topic

Related Articles

Analysis

Eagles–Rams Puts Defensive-Front Versatility Back in Focus

The Eagles’ defensive front needs more than recognizable names against the Rams. It needs enough versatility to keep pressure, run fits and linebacker protection working together when Los Angeles changes the picture.

Analysis

The Eagles’ Screen Game Starts With Fitting the Quarterback

The Eagles’ screen game will not improve just because the play sheet contains more screens. Philadelphia needs calls that fit Jalen Hurts, the available receivers and the protection picture the defense presents.

Analysis

Jalen Hurts Can Raise the Eagles’ Level, but He Cannot Replace an Entire Roster

Jalen Hurts can give the Eagles a chance against the Rams without being able to replace every missing player. Philadelphia’s injury report turns that distinction into a practical football problem, not an excuse to lower the quarterback’s standard.

Analysis

Jonathan Greenard’s Workload Could Decide the Eagles’ Matthew Stafford Matchup

Jonathan Greenard’s workload could shape whether Philadelphia makes Matthew Stafford rush his decisions or asks its secondary to cover for too long. The Eagles’ defensive plan cannot depend on the mere presence of a pass rusher; it depends on the pressure he can provide during the snaps that decide possessions.

Analysis

The Eagles’ Third-Quarter Three-and-Out Problem Puts Sean Mannion Under Pressure

Philadelphia’s third-quarter three-and-out problem puts Sean Mannion’s job under a demanding microscope: the offense has to find usable answers after halftime, not merely look promising in its initial plan. A coordinator’s long-term potential does not keep the defense rested or rescue a possession that ends before the opponent feels any pressure.

Analysis

DeVonta Smith’s Injury Uncertainty Gives Makai Lemon a Bigger Eagles Test

DeVonta Smith’s injury uncertainty makes Makai Lemon’s next opportunity more than a chance to collect targets. Philadelphia needs another receiver who can keep the passing game functional when its established options are unavailable, not simply somebody whose box-score totals rise because the ball has nowhere else to go.