Skip to main content

Cut Jake Elliott: The Eagles Can't Afford a Bottom-Five Kicker at $6 Million

Jake Elliott has been a bottom-five kicker for two consecutive seasons while earning $6 million. The Eagles have bigger problems, but paying premium money for a liability isn't how you build a championship roster.

T

The JAKIB Staff

contributor

3 min read

There's a simple rule in professional football: if your kicker is a bottom-five player at his position for two consecutive years, he's not your kicker anymore. Jake Elliott has been exactly that — bottom five in 2024, bottom five in 2025 — and the Eagles are paying him $6 million a year for the privilege of watching field goals sail wide.

Cut him. Bring in competition. Move on. This isn't complicated.

The Nostalgia Trap

Eagles fans still remember the 61-yard bomb that beat the Giants in Elliott's rookie year. That was 2017. It's 2026. Nostalgia is a hell of a drug, but it doesn't win football games. The Jake Elliott who hit that kick and the Jake Elliott who's been shanking field goals for two straight seasons are not the same player.

Look at what Baltimore did with Justin Tucker — arguably the greatest kicker in NFL history. When Tucker started falling apart, the Ravens moved on. They didn't let sentiment cloud their judgment. Tucker was running out of steam, and the organization had the clarity to acknowledge it. If Baltimore can move on from the GOAT kicker, Philadelphia can move on from a guy who's been below replacement level.

The Cap Argument

Cutting Elliott won't save a massive amount of cap space — this isn't an A.J. Brown trade scenario. But $6 million for a liability is $6 million that could go toward an offensive lineman, a depth piece, or even just rolling into next year's cap. Every dollar matters when you're trying to extend Jalen Carter and potentially sign Bradley Chubb.

More importantly, kicker is one of the easiest positions to replace. The Rams changed their kicker mid-season and it worked out fine. There are capable kickers available every offseason. You don't need to draft one in the first round. You just need someone who can make the kicks that Elliott has been missing.

Games Are Won in the Margins

In a season where the Eagles might be projected for 7-11 wins depending on who you ask, every game matters. And kickers decide close games. A missed field goal in a three-point loss is the difference between a playoff berth and watching from the couch. The Eagles can't afford to keep trotting out a guy they don't trust from 45 yards.

At minimum, bring in real competition. Not a camp body — a legitimate challenger who can push Elliott or replace him. If Elliott rises to the challenge and returns to form, great. But if he's the same kicker he's been for two years, you need a contingency plan that's already in the building.

The Eagles are making sweeping changes to their coaching staff and potentially their offensive philosophy. They're talking about trading their best receiver. They're shifting to a spread offense. But they're going to keep the kicker who can't make kicks? That's the one thing they won't change? Come on. Elliott's time in Philadelphia should be over. Two years of bottom-five production at $6 million a year is two years too many.

Support independent Eagles coverage

Explore JAKIB membership and find the option that works for you.

Explore membership
T

The JAKIB Staff

AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.

Share this article

Related Articles

Analysis

The Eagles’ Backup Quarterback Problem Is Bigger Than One Bad Start

The Eagles invested in backup quarterbacks. The harder question is whether practice work, scheme fit and a usable replacement plan prepared the offense to function when the quarterback changed.

Analysis

Sacks Cannot Cover for a Broken Eagles Run Fit

An interior defender can escape a block and still expose his linebacker. The Eagles run-fit discussion turns on leverage, coordinated assignments and what happens before the runner reaches the hole.

Analysis

The Sixers’ 7–1 Start Still Leaves an Embiid–LeBron Fit Test

Philadelphia’s 7–1 start gives the Sixers a productive setting to test Joel Embiid and LeBron James together. Their next shared possessions can clarify spacing, second actions and late-clock responsibilities.

Analysis

The Eagles’ Run Defense Is Making Zack Baun Play Catch-Up

When the defensive line loses ground, a linebacker’s path and leverage change. The Eagles need to assess the entire run fit before isolating Zack Baun.

Analysis

The Eagles Cannot Separate the Stoutland Exit From Their Offensive Bet

The Eagles changed their line coaching and their offensive approach together. Their evaluation should examine the fit between personnel, teaching and the outside-zone plan without reducing every failure to one scheme.

Analysis

Evan Neal’s Eagles Opportunity Starts With Guard Fundamentals

Evan Neal’s practice-squad signing gives Philadelphia an interior-line development option. His next opportunity depends on repeatable guard technique, rather than his old draft position.