Skip to main content

Cut Jake Elliott: The Eagles Can't Afford a Bottom-Five Kicker at $6 Million

Jake Elliott has been a bottom-five kicker for two consecutive seasons while earning $6 million. The Eagles have bigger problems, but paying premium money for a liability isn't how you build a championship roster.

T

The JAKIB Staff

contributor

3 min read

There's a simple rule in professional football: if your kicker is a bottom-five player at his position for two consecutive years, he's not your kicker anymore. Jake Elliott has been exactly that — bottom five in 2024, bottom five in 2025 — and the Eagles are paying him $6 million a year for the privilege of watching field goals sail wide.

Cut him. Bring in competition. Move on. This isn't complicated.

The Nostalgia Trap

Eagles fans still remember the 61-yard bomb that beat the Giants in Elliott's rookie year. That was 2017. It's 2026. Nostalgia is a hell of a drug, but it doesn't win football games. The Jake Elliott who hit that kick and the Jake Elliott who's been shanking field goals for two straight seasons are not the same player.

Look at what Baltimore did with Justin Tucker — arguably the greatest kicker in NFL history. When Tucker started falling apart, the Ravens moved on. They didn't let sentiment cloud their judgment. Tucker was running out of steam, and the organization had the clarity to acknowledge it. If Baltimore can move on from the GOAT kicker, Philadelphia can move on from a guy who's been below replacement level.

The Cap Argument

Cutting Elliott won't save a massive amount of cap space — this isn't an A.J. Brown trade scenario. But $6 million for a liability is $6 million that could go toward an offensive lineman, a depth piece, or even just rolling into next year's cap. Every dollar matters when you're trying to extend Jalen Carter and potentially sign Bradley Chubb.

More importantly, kicker is one of the easiest positions to replace. The Rams changed their kicker mid-season and it worked out fine. There are capable kickers available every offseason. You don't need to draft one in the first round. You just need someone who can make the kicks that Elliott has been missing.

Games Are Won in the Margins

In a season where the Eagles might be projected for 7-11 wins depending on who you ask, every game matters. And kickers decide close games. A missed field goal in a three-point loss is the difference between a playoff berth and watching from the couch. The Eagles can't afford to keep trotting out a guy they don't trust from 45 yards.

At minimum, bring in real competition. Not a camp body — a legitimate challenger who can push Elliott or replace him. If Elliott rises to the challenge and returns to form, great. But if he's the same kicker he's been for two years, you need a contingency plan that's already in the building.

The Eagles are making sweeping changes to their coaching staff and potentially their offensive philosophy. They're talking about trading their best receiver. They're shifting to a spread offense. But they're going to keep the kicker who can't make kicks? That's the one thing they won't change? Come on. Elliott's time in Philadelphia should be over. Two years of bottom-five production at $6 million a year is two years too many.

Support independent Eagles coverage

Explore JAKIB membership and find the option that works for you.

Explore membership
T

The JAKIB Staff

AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.

Share this article

Related Articles

Analysis

Why Backup Quarterback Mobility Matters More Than Ever

A backup quarterback rarely receives the same protection, timing or playbook freedom as the starter. Mobility can rescue the broken downs that decide whether the Eagles survive an injury without asking a reserve to imitate Jalen Hurts.

Analysis

Why Saquon Barkley Is Not a Perfect Fit for the Eagles' New Offense

Saquon Barkley remains the center of Philadelphia's offense, but Sean Mannion's new run design asks him to win differently. The Eagles can make the transition work without pretending it recreates the 2,000-yard formula that already proved ideal for their star back.

Analysis

The Eagles Still Need a Tight End Upgrade After Cutting to 53

The Eagles reached their initial 53 with Dallas Goedert atop a tight end room that still lacks a proven second option. Johnny Mundt offers blocking value, but Eli Stowers' development and E.J. Jenkins' limited receiving experience leave Philadelphia exposed behind its starter.

Analysis

Why Elijah Moore Made the Eagles' Initial 53 Over Other Roster Needs

Elijah Moore's place on the Eagles' initial 53 reflects more than a strong summer. Philadelphia needs immediate receiver insurance because rookie Makai Lemon may not be ready for a full Week 1 role, even as other positions remain thin.

News

McMullen Says the Eagles Have Discussed a J.J. McCarthy Trade

The Eagles have discussed a potential J.J. McCarthy trade as their four-quarterback roster creates pressure for another move. Any deal would hinge on Philadelphia's view of Tanner McKee, Minnesota's quarterback plan and the value of longer-term control behind Jalen Hurts.

Analysis

Eagles Final 53: Why the Tight End and Receiver Depth Chart Matters

The Eagles enter final cuts with most receiver roles defined and several tight-end paths still open. Eli Stowers' status, Grant Calcaterra's health and the value of a sixth receiver can reshape the last few offensive roster spots.