Cut Jake Elliott: The Eagles Can't Afford a Bottom-Five Kicker at $6 Million
Jake Elliott has been a bottom-five kicker for two consecutive seasons while earning $6 million. The Eagles have bigger problems, but paying premium money for a liability isn't how you build a championship roster.
The JAKIB Staff
contributor
There's a simple rule in professional football: if your kicker is a bottom-five player at his position for two consecutive years, he's not your kicker anymore. Jake Elliott has been exactly that — bottom five in 2024, bottom five in 2025 — and the Eagles are paying him $6 million a year for the privilege of watching field goals sail wide.
Cut him. Bring in competition. Move on. This isn't complicated.
The Nostalgia Trap
Eagles fans still remember the 61-yard bomb that beat the Giants in Elliott's rookie year. That was 2017. It's 2026. Nostalgia is a hell of a drug, but it doesn't win football games. The Jake Elliott who hit that kick and the Jake Elliott who's been shanking field goals for two straight seasons are not the same player.
Look at what Baltimore did with Justin Tucker — arguably the greatest kicker in NFL history. When Tucker started falling apart, the Ravens moved on. They didn't let sentiment cloud their judgment. Tucker was running out of steam, and the organization had the clarity to acknowledge it. If Baltimore can move on from the GOAT kicker, Philadelphia can move on from a guy who's been below replacement level.
The Cap Argument
Cutting Elliott won't save a massive amount of cap space — this isn't an A.J. Brown trade scenario. But $6 million for a liability is $6 million that could go toward an offensive lineman, a depth piece, or even just rolling into next year's cap. Every dollar matters when you're trying to extend Jalen Carter and potentially sign Bradley Chubb.
More importantly, kicker is one of the easiest positions to replace. The Rams changed their kicker mid-season and it worked out fine. There are capable kickers available every offseason. You don't need to draft one in the first round. You just need someone who can make the kicks that Elliott has been missing.
Games Are Won in the Margins
In a season where the Eagles might be projected for 7-11 wins depending on who you ask, every game matters. And kickers decide close games. A missed field goal in a three-point loss is the difference between a playoff berth and watching from the couch. The Eagles can't afford to keep trotting out a guy they don't trust from 45 yards.
At minimum, bring in real competition. Not a camp body — a legitimate challenger who can push Elliott or replace him. If Elliott rises to the challenge and returns to form, great. But if he's the same kicker he's been for two years, you need a contingency plan that's already in the building.
The Eagles are making sweeping changes to their coaching staff and potentially their offensive philosophy. They're talking about trading their best receiver. They're shifting to a spread offense. But they're going to keep the kicker who can't make kicks? That's the one thing they won't change? Come on. Elliott's time in Philadelphia should be over. Two years of bottom-five production at $6 million a year is two years too many.

Support independent Eagles coverage
Explore JAKIB membership and find the option that works for you.
The JAKIB Staff
AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.
Related Articles
Evan Neal’s Eagles Opportunity Starts With Guard Fundamentals
Evan Neal’s practice-squad signing gives Philadelphia an interior-line development option. His next opportunity depends on repeatable guard technique, rather than his old draft position.
Jake Majors’ Natural Position Matters in the Eagles’ Center Decision
Jake Majors’ natural position gives the Eagles a reason to limit disruption at center. Availability and exchange reliability should drive the decision without turning an unofficial depth chart into a starting lineup.
Why the Eagles’ Offense Still Has No Clear Identity
The Eagles have tried to blend new and familiar offensive concepts. The real test is whether Jalen Hurts and the line have connected answers when defenses change the picture.
Jalen Hurts Can Raise the Eagles’ Level, but He Cannot Replace an Entire Roster
Jalen Hurts can give the Eagles a chance against the Rams without being able to replace every missing player. Philadelphia’s injury report turns that distinction into a practical football problem, not an excuse to lower the quarterback’s standard.
The Eagles’ Zone-Run Transition Has an Offensive-Line Cost
The Eagles' zone-run transition is putting a different demand on an offensive line built with other blocking strengths. That helps explain why early-down runs can stall even when the ball carrier makes a reasonable decision. A reach landmark missed by one lineman can close the intended lane before.
Why Darnell Wright Is the Bears Run-Game Test for Philadelphia
Darnell Wright gives the Bears a right-side rushing challenge that could matter even more if Chicago starts a backup quarterback. The Eagles need to meet Wright and guard Jonah Jackson at the point of attack; otherwise Chicago can keep Monday’s game on schedule without asking its passer to carry every series.
Latest from JAKIB Sports
View all articles →The Cowboys’ Star Receivers Are Not Fixing Their Offensive Balance
October 23, 2026
Dallas’ Third-and-Long Failures Give the Eagles a Specific Opening
October 23, 2026
The Eagles’ Coaching-Hire Debate Has Three Different Decisions
October 23, 2026
Cam Jurgens’ Return to Center Gives the Eagles a New Comparison
October 23, 2026
