Skip to main content

Dallas Goedert Decision Looms: Pay Him or Remake the TE Room?

At 31 with career-high touchdowns, Goedert wants to return. But at what cost — and does Philadelphia have a succession plan?

T

The JAKIB Staff

contributor

4 min read

The Tight End Crossroads

Dallas Goedert is open to returning to Philadelphia. That's the easy part. The hard part is everything else.

Goedert just played out a restructured one-year, $10 million deal in 2025, and the results were legitimately impressive. He appeared in 15 games, caught 60 passes for 591 yards, and posted a career-high 11 touchdown catches. For a tight end many thought was on the decline, that production demands respect.

But Goedert turns 31 this year. And the Eagles have zero succession plan at the position.

The Contract Math

The conversation on Goedert's next deal is fascinating because the market projections seem wildly deflated. Spotrac's estimated market value puts him at just one year, $6 million. After a career-high touchdown season? After playing a pivotal role in a Super Bowl run? That math doesn't add up.

Coming off 11 touchdowns, Goedert has earned more than $10 million. But how much more can a team comfortably invest in a 31-year-old tight end? The realistic range is probably somewhere between $8-12 million annually on a short-term deal — maybe two years with an option.

The problem isn't just Goedert's price tag. It's what happens behind him. Every tight end on the Eagles' roster is a pending free agent. C.J. Uzomah, Grant Calcaterra — the entire room could be gutted. If Goedert walks and nobody else is signed, the Eagles don't just lose their starter. They lose the entire position group.

The Succession Problem

This is where Philadelphia's front office dropped the ball. When Zach Ertz was still here, the Eagles drafted Goedert in the second round as the heir apparent. That succession plan worked beautifully. There is no equivalent plan in place today.

Ja'Corion Bennett is still on the roster but hasn't developed into a reliable option. The draft could provide answers — there are legitimate tight end prospects available on Day 2 and Day 3 — but a rookie tight end isn't replacing Goedert's production in Year 1. Not in Kellen Moore's offense. Not in a Super Bowl window.

The smart play would have been to start the succession planning last offseason when it was clear Goedert's long-term future was uncertain. That didn't happen. Now the Eagles are up against it.

Pay or Rebuild?

There are two clear paths here:

**Path 1: Bring Goedert back on a team-friendly deal** — Two years, $18-20 million with limited guarantees. This gives the Eagles their proven producer while they draft a young tight end to develop behind him. It's the safe play and probably the right one given the Super Bowl window.

**Path 2: Let Goedert walk and remake the room** — Draft a tight end early (Day 2), sign a veteran backup, and accept a downgrade at the position for 2026. This frees cap space for edge rusher or cornerback spending and commits to a younger, cheaper roster construction.

The risk with Path 2 is obvious: the Eagles have too many other needs to also be rebuilding the tight end room from scratch. They need edge rush. They need interior offensive line help. They need a Lane Johnson succession plan. They need a third wide receiver. Adding "starting tight end" to that list makes the offseason almost impossible to navigate.

The Verdict

Bring Goedert back, but don't overpay. A two-year deal in the $9-10 million annual range keeps the offense intact while the Eagles invest draft capital in a young tight end who can learn behind a proven veteran.

The Eagles can't afford to rebuild every position group simultaneously. Goedert earned another contract with his 2025 performance. Just make sure there's a 22-year-old learning behind him by September.

The tight end room cannot be an afterthought. Not again.

Support independent Eagles coverage

Explore JAKIB membership and find the option that works for you.

Explore membership
T

The JAKIB Staff

AI-powered content assistant for JAKIB Sports. Articles generated from show transcripts and Eagles coverage.

Share this article

Related Articles

Analysis

The Eagles’ Screen Game Starts With Fitting the Quarterback

The Eagles’ screen game will not improve just because the play sheet contains more screens. Philadelphia needs calls that fit Jalen Hurts, the available receivers and the protection picture the defense presents.

Analysis

Jalen Hurts Can Raise the Eagles’ Level, but He Cannot Replace an Entire Roster

Jalen Hurts can give the Eagles a chance against the Rams without being able to replace every missing player. Philadelphia’s injury report turns that distinction into a practical football problem, not an excuse to lower the quarterback’s standard.

Analysis

Drew Kendall’s Emergence Complicates the Eagles’ Left-Guard Decision

Drew Kendall’s emergence changes the Eagles’ left-guard debate because moving Cam Jurgens back to center would displace a promising performer. Any Landon Dickerson scenario remains conditional on health and an actual team decision.

Analysis

The Eagles’ Blocking Personnel Are Limiting Sean Mannion’s Offense

The Eagles’ blocking personnel are limiting the concepts Sean Mannion can make reliable. Better calls matter, but screens and play-action need assignments that survive contact before Jalen Hurts can provide the payoff.

Analysis

Why Nick Sirianni’s Fourth-Down Decisions Matter After the Bears Loss

The punt on fourth-and-one, a later fourth-and-five interception, and an empty goal-line trip made Philadelphia’s decisions part of the 27-7 loss. The issue is how each call changed the Eagles’ chance to score or keep Chicago off the field.

Analysis

Why Zach Ertz’s Return Does Not End the Eagles’ Pass-Catcher Questions

Zach Ertz gives the Eagles a familiar tight-end option, but his game-day role had not been confirmed at publication. Dallas Goedert’s absence and the Darius Cooper–Makai Lemon usage question still leave Sean Mannion with decisions that one veteran addition cannot settle.